This was my response.
Are unions evil was a recent headline in your
newspaper. First, there was no need for
that kind of pejorative headline. The
man you had argue that unions were evil was sadly misinformed. He used terms like “infiltrate and termites” to
characterize unions. This is a childish
way to denigrate unions. He pays the
obligatory compliment to unions. “When unions were first created there was a
need for them.” What’s changed to make
them unneeded? We have managers and
supervisors who try and bully and intimate employees today, and terminate
employees on species charges. In fact
most of his argument makes the case for unions.
In his opinion, He states unions are the no. 1 reason companies have
gone overseas. The reason companies go
overseas is so they can exploit workers where there are no unions to protect
them. Why do you think that pro-business
politicians are trying to do away with OSHA AND NLRB or rescind minimum wage
laws? In fact there are politicians and businesses trying to do away with child
labor laws. Mr. Jamail I’m sure would
try and spin these things as trying to help businesses.
His other premise is that unions protect bad employees. All unions do is to make sure that there is
due process. He suggested union
employees are lazy and non-productive. I would have liked to have proof of that
statement. Lastly this old argument that unions thrive on conflict or want
companies to fail is possibly one of the more stupid things that I have
heard. Most union decisions are local
and voted on by the membership. One of several things Mr. Jamail doesn’t
understand is that the job is our livelihood. We have just as much desire to
have a safe and profitable place to work as the company.
No comments:
Post a Comment